INTERPRETING GENETIC STRUCTURE BY DEPLOYING LINGUISTIC STRUCTURE
Abstract
(S)talker issearching the truths
of atomic level of biological existence. He is swinging from formalism to
non-formalism and vise versa. This project is based on a presumption: triplets
in a genetic string behave almost like linguistic structure. The investigators
of this projects analogically considered genetic string as a body of linguistic
structure. By virtue of potentiality of occurrence in a certain context, a
linguistic unit (like phoneme [In case of codons, all the nucleotides A, G, T,
C are metaphorically considered as smallest units], Morpheme, lexeme all the
triplets/exons are, for the time being metaphorically considered as words],
sentence) enters into interdependent syntagmatic relation. Each triplet occurs syntagmatically
with each other, e.g., ATG syntagmatically co-occurs with TTT or TGC, i.e., all
the 64 triplets have a definite selectional restriction rule and they are
subjected to the Projection Principle at the moment of producing innumerable
proteins. One may also say that if some triplets are producing same amino acid
are said to be in a paradigmatic relationship (one can be substituted by the
other). They are metaphorically considered as synonymous. However, there are
some crucial questions: in a given syntagm of a genetic string, how the
triplets are distributed? Is there any (inter)dependency relationship among
triplets? Before going to answer such crucial questions and before going to
deploy Chomskian syntactic tools (data is to be fit into the model), we had set
our primary task to find out the rank-frequency distribution of triplets. We
had deployed a particular statistico-linguistic law, i.e., Zipf’s Law, to
understand the rank versus frequency distribution of the codons. What we had
found was that the Zipf’sexponent differentiates in case of genetic sequences.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
For detailed discussion, kindly follow
hyperlinks (blue-colored
titles)
·
2001.
(with A. Som, S. Chattopadhyay and J. Chakrabarti) “Codon Distribution in DNA.” Physical Review E. Vol. 63,
issue 5, 051908. (pp.051908-1- 051908-8). U.S.A. Download (.pdf)
·
2001. (with
S. Chattopadhyay, J. Chakrabarti and A. Som)
“Identification
of Human Proteins Using Linguist’s Tools”. Indian Journal of
Biochemistry and Biophysics. Vol. 38, February and April, 2001. (pp. 124-127). Download (.pdf)
·
1999. (with S.
Chattopadhyay, J. Chakrabarti and A. Som)
“Linguistic Approach to Molecular Recognition”. Seminar on Biophysics for moleculer
recognition (poster presentation), Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, September
26-29, 19 Download (.pdf)
This project was executed in
collaboration with Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science , Kolkata. My heartiest
thanks to S. Chattopadhyay, J. Chakrabarti and A. Som for their kind academic
support.
----#
Debaprasad
Bandyopadhyay *
^ দেবপ্রসাদ বন্দ্যোপাধ্যায় ^
Digiart: Akhar Bandyopadhyay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.